As Spring semester begins in the next few weeks, it may be time to address the growing use of AI in the classroom. Like many of you, my first taste of consumer-facing generative Artificial Intelligence was after the release of ChatGPT in late 2022. In just the past year, the technology has grown in prominence filling in more areas relevant to education. While I have up to now simply used the college-wide Academic Dishonesty Policy as the basis of my approach to AI usage, it’s time for me to reframe AI usage in my class away from a blanket ban.
I am considering this change for two reasons. First, interacting with AI using prompts is a skill that requires practice. If we don’t let our students make those mistakes and grow from them in college, then they will make them later in jobs. Second, some students are using AI already. It’s best to harness their usage into an effective manner that will lead to student success. It is with this in mind that I am considering the following language for my AI Policy:
Artificial Intelligence: In this course the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) follows the same guidelines as the plagiarism policy. That is to say that it cannot be used to write any substantial part of your writings, including Discussion Posts, Essays, Memorandum, and any other work. While AI technology is NOT required for this course, it is allowed in the following ways and under the following conditions:
- AI software can be used to Brainstorm Ideas, Refine Ideas, and Organize Thoughts. It can also be for Spelling and Grammar Checks.
- Whenever AI is used, it should be given “accurate acknowledgement” via a footnote that explains in at least one complete sentence the specific software used and the specific uses in your work.
While I am not 100% sure as to my final version, it is definitely my starting point for establishing a new relationship with this technology and seeing it as potential tool for education. What are your thoughts? Does this achieve my goals? Does it achieve YOUR goals?
Write your thoughts in the comments.
Andrew Levin 